Cinecolor has its ups and downs for sure— but it’s sure fun to revisit old Castle Cinecolor Comi-Color prints!
First — a few Thunderbean updates:
With summer started here, my commitments at the school are a lot less — so it’s always a Thunderbean summer for me. This year, it’s almost all catching up— and we have a really good start by getting a lot of the ‘special sets’ in the can. I’m not sure how much longer we’ll do them, but getting a bunch out at the same time seems like a good strategy since we’ll be caught up a lot sooner.
I had a great time in Columbus, Ohio at the yearly Columbus Moving Picture Show. It’s a great event in both seeing a lot of movies as well as a ballroom-sized dealer’s room. For everyone that reads Cartoon Research and stopped by to say hi, it was nice to meet you or see you again! I really love chatting with people in person that enjoys classic animation.
We’ll be getting Mid Century Modern 3 finally out the door this month, along with another small barrage of special discs. To help move things forward, we’ve decided to open the ‘Special Disc Vault’ for a week, with 15% off all things. It’s a good time to grab anything you missed since it’s hard to say if we’ll offer them again.
Now — onto our cartoon: The Big Bad Wolf (originally titled “Little Boy Blue”)- a 16mm reference print!
We’ve been working for a while on the Comi-Color series here… with new scans of the black and white seperations coming in as we speak. They’re all from the negatives and master positives except a few from early in the series. Working with the original material is great. I love the look of the older Cinecolor prints and hope to get as close to that look as possible. Funny enough, I’m even a fan of the *different* versions of the color on the Comi-Colors: they look one way in the 35mm material, and sometimes, depending on the print, pretty different in the later Castle Films 16mm Cinecolor prints.
So: what’s correct— and what’s the best strategy to get it ‘right’??!?
In working from camera negatives, it’s almost impossible to get the exact look of a Cinecolor print. I think you can start to get pretty close, but the negatives are so much finer in terms of detail and contrast that it makes the actual Cinecolor prints look somewhat fuzzy and too contrast-heavy. This applies to both Cinecolor and Technicolor. Then again, the filmmakers understood the process in working with it, limitations included— so there was at least the knowledge that this process would yield a certain result.
This is the same struggle I had with the Blu-ray set we did of the Rainbow Parade cartoons, volume 1, all made in Cinecolor. The prints, some done in original release, some done later, in 35mm in 1942, some done in 16mm later, in the 40s and 50s were all over the place in terms of color timing and look. I tried hard to get some consistency in contrast, brightness and color saturation, but still didn’t make everyone too happy in terms of the ‘final look’- and, in hindsight, I wish I would have gone a little less saturated on some films. For some of the films, the 16mm prints were *far* apart from each other in terms of their look color-wise, and that was also really difficult to try and get some consistent grading on.
We’re working on the Technicolor Rainbow Parades really heavily right now. All of them are Technicolor prints, except one, from the negative. Having that one has been incredibly helpful for grading the others.
I’ve been scanning prints as well (in 16 and 35mm) for reference where I can. I’m using both 35mm and 16mm prints for this process. Here’s a print of The Big Bad Wolf (Little Boy Blue). It’s a 1947 Cinecolor print (note in the frame below it has two symbols (in this case square triangle) after the words “Kodak Film” (backwards in the scan). The symbols Kodak used for stock repeated every 20 years, and certain stocks are pretty identifiable once you’ve been working with film for a while. This notes that this print is from 1947 since the stock didn’t existin the 20 years before or after.
So— here’s that reference print I just scanned about a month back. The Castle prints tend to be too blue; to show this example and how it’s useful, I’ve pulled the blue down just slightly to balance. It’s a pretty nice print in terms of the color balance— and actually pretty close in color to the 35mm version-more so than some prints I’ve seen and am working with. I’ve left this print otherwise just as it was scanned, so you can get an idea of what a Cinecolor print and soundtrack looks like.
For those who know this stuff like the back of your hand, I apologize!
Have a good week all!


Steve Stanchfield is an animator, educator and film archivist. He runs Thunderbean Animation, an animation studio in Ann Arbor, Michigan and has compiled over a dozen archival animation DVD collections devoted to such subjects at Private Snafu, The Little King and the infamous Cubby Bear. Steve is also a professor at the College for Creative Studies in Detroit.
















I very much look forward to the “special“ sets that you are releasing as I ordered so many of them or I should say “pre-ordered“ many of them. This particular cartoon was last heard by me as part of the laser disc “cartoons that time forgot” collections. I don’t know how that stacks up against what you’ve talked about here as far as differing color schemes on varying quality prints. I know that the set did not always feature the original titles, but I know your collection will do the best it can too give us the films as people saw them back in the 1930s or 1940s. Good luck to further restorations.
Just goes to show that if the artists are aware of the limitations of Cinecolor they can design a film that looks very good to the eye. Thanks for posting.
Steve, for what it is worth, I’d reference the look of the 16mm Comi-Color LPP prints that Blackhawk sold about the time they were folding up their tent. (1983-85) These were pretty consistent in their cine-color color ranges from title to title, but sharpened the drawing outlines noticeably, at least in the 8 prints I have. ( Pretty sure you know who the lab tech was 🙂 Would make a good centerline IMO.
I once saw a 16mm Cinecolor print of the Popeye short “ABUSEMENT PARK”. The picture appeared to be more dark/opaque when projected because, unlike other film stocks, the frames were printed on both sides of the film rather than just one, allowing less light to shine through.
I did not like Cinecolor Cartoons when I first saw them however watching my audiences react to them witch excitement was a real eye opener. Now I love them. Never thought until now there would be a color difference between 16mm and 35.
This is a stunningly beautiful cartoon for a Cinecolor creation, thank you for sharing it.
Would it be possible to post a film from the Aesop’s Fables series next time, please?
Van Beuren cartoons are really great fun to watch and most of them deserve to be brought to the forefront, not least films like “Runaway Blackie” and “AM to PM” released in 1933.