By the end of 1970 Osamu Tezuka was gone, leaving the wreckage of Mushi Productions behind him. It was no secret that Tezuka’s feature Cleopatra had doomed the studio; but there were two other reasons that Tezuka had given up on Mushi Productions. One in particular, although it was entirely his own fault, made Tezuka disgusted with the Mushi mess.
To digress somewhat, Tezuka always had the bad habit of knowingly taking on more work than he could possibly deliver upon. He was also personally more interested in experimental animation and comics than in the juvenile manga & anime that paid his bills. In October 1988, just before he died, Tezuka wrote a brief essay about his life’s work in which he said that his personal goal in creating Mushi Productions and making the 1962-1966 Astro Boy TV series had been to finance his experimental animation. Also, by the late 1960s “adult” manga had begun appearing in Japan, emphasizing mature themes of crime, war, homosexuality, psychoanalysis, passion, obsession, eroticism, and so on. The attitude grew that this was the modern evolution of manga. Manga for children – notably Tezuka’s manga – was passé. Tezuka did not like being sidelined, and determined to prove that he was not washed up. The popular failure of his Animerama theatrical features must have been more than just a financial disappointment to him. Mushi Prod.’s continued future would be to grind out more same-old children’s TV cartoons. Tezuka was an artist first and a businessman second. He did not want a creative millstone around his neck.Tezuka’s interest in Tezuka Productions for anime and the 1971-1972 Marvelous Melmo animated TV series has already been noted. Tezuka had far more artistic freedom in his self-produced manga. He had already begun evolving his Phoenix (Hinotori) series toward more mature themes in 1967. Beginning in 1968, and especially around 1970 to 1973, Tezuka devoted his manga to adult themes “that could not possibly be animated” to establish himself as much more than a children’s cartoonist and animator. Swallowing the Earth (Chikyu o Nomu), 1968-1969. I.L, 1969-1970. Apollo’s Song (Apollo no Uta), 1970. Ode to Kirihito (Kirihito Sanka), 1970-1971. The Book of Human Insects (Ningen Konchukki), 1970-1971. Alabaster, 1970-1971. The Birdman Anthology (Chojin Taikei), 1971-1975. Ayako, 1972-1973, and its sequel, Barbara, 1973-1974. The Melody of Iron (Tetsu no Senritsu), 1974. Most of these were originally serialized in the semi-monthly Big Comic, a seinan manga (aimed at younger men, the 18 to 40 age range). By the time that Tezuka returned to “children’s manga” in 1972-1973, it was really to the all-ages decade-long serialized manga of Buddha and Black Jack. After working for most of the 1970s on this, Tezuka had redefined himself by the end of the 1970s as a manga artist who was equally comfortable creating manga for children (Unico, Atomcat) and for adults (MW, Message to Adolf (Adolf ni Tsugu)).
Returning to the end of Mushi Productions, the more personal reason that Tezuka left his creation was the betrayal of one of his sales managers, Yoshinobu Nishizaki (1934-2010). Nishizaki joined Mushi Prod. in 1970. At that time one of Tezuka’s jobs was to create new story concepts for Mushi to produce, and two ideas that he came up with were Triton of the Sea (Umi no Toriton) and Little Wansa (Wansa-kun). As was usual, Tezuka conceived of these as manga that he would personally write/draw, to be followed by a TV animated series that Mushi Prod. would produce. The manga was always Tezuka’s sole responsibility. The TV production had to be registered by Mushi Productions. The TV copyright registration required the name of the creator/producer. Tezuka, who was then fully occupied with the production of Cleopatra, trusted Nishizaki to file the anime copyright registration.
Wikipedia says, “Nishizaki produced his first anime, Triton of the Sea, in 1972, and followed it up with the ambitious musical comedy Wansa-kun in 1973; both were based on Tezuka manga, but due to an apparent copyright mixup on Nishizaki’s part, Tezuka lost the rights to the anime versions of both series, and Mushi Production made both shows without Tezuka’s involvement.” Dr. Tezuka told me that there was no copyright mixup. Nishizaki took Tezuka’s name off of the copyright forms and substituted his own. He reasoned that everyone at Mushi except Tezuka knew that Cleopatra was going to be a failure; that Tezuka was showing less and less interest in Mushi Productions; and that Tezuka was unlikely to redevelop enough interest to fight Nishizaki to take the properties back. More significantly, Tezuka was aware that everyone at Mushi Prod. knew what had really happened, and that most of them didn’t care. They considered that it was basically Tezuka’s fault for letting his properties be stolen from under his nose.
This is Dr. Tezuka’s own view of what happened. Again he was quivering with anger when he told me about it in 1979. In any case, it was no secret and was widely discussed in the Japanese professional animation community, with opinions divided as to whether Nishizaki was a traitor who had hastened Tezuka’s departure and Mushi’s going out of business, or a hero who had fought off Tezuka’s disinterest and kept Mushi going for a little longer. Nishizaki apparently predicted Mushi’s staff’s disinterest correctly.
Triton of the Sea (27 episodes, April 1 – September 30, 1972) and Little Wansa (26 episodes, April 2 – September 24, 1973) were animated by Mushi Productions with Yoshinobu Nishizaki listed as producer. (For some reason, Nishizaki used the name Yoshinori Nishizaki as producer of Little Wansa, causing some to think that he was trying to disguise himself as a nonexistent brother; but everyone knew that it was the same person. Nishizaki’s birth name had been Hirofumi Nishizaki. The Japanese find it easier to change their names than Westerners. Two well-known examples in the animation and manga industries are Rintarō, born Shigeyuki Hayashi, who is also sometimes known as Kuruma Hino; and Shōtarō Onodera, who became first Shōtarō Ishimori and then Shōtarō Ishinomori.)
Little Wansa was unusual because Tezuka had originally created the tiny white cartoon Akita puppy as the mascot for the Sanwa bank chain – “Wansa” is “Sanwa” pronounced backwards – and Sanwa was the hoped-for TV cartoon’s sponsor. Wansa was frequently shown in Tezuka’s unfinished manga and in Nishizaki’s TV cartoons as cutely pissing on a fire hydrant, a tree, the side of a house, or anything else – he was supposed to have become a stray dog before he was housebroken.
The TV cartoon, directed by Eichi Yamamoto, had a memorably lively theme song by Hiroshi Miyagawa, with all of the dogs dancing a Charleston including the unhousebroken Wansa-kun. Little Wansa was Mushi’s final TV production before the studio declared bankruptcy. After Mushi Prod. closed, the staff went their separate ways. Nishizaki created his own Animation Staffroom studio, with many ex-Mushi employees (and, according to rumor, a lot of Mushi’s production equipment), and created the much more successful Space Battleship Yamato (Uchu Senkan Yamato), also with a memorable theme song by Hiroshi Miyagawa.And what about Mushi’s third and final Animerama theatrical cartoon, the third and last of “Tezuka’s adult features”? Of course, Tezuka had virtually nothing to do with it. He may have created the basic concept of three Animerama features, but by the time that Mushi Prod. had finished production of Cleopatra and was ready to move on to #3, Belladonna of Sadness (Kanashimi no Belladonna – I am not the only one to think that it should’ve been called The Tragedy of Belladonna in English, rather than translating the title literally), Tezuka had left the studio, everyone knew that Mushi Prod. could no longer afford to develop and produce a theatrical feature, and there was serious doubt that it could be finished before Mushi Prod. declared bankruptcy and closed. Some critics have theorized that the “of Sadness” subtitle was chosen more because that was the mood of the animators; they knew that they were working on Mushi Prod.’s final production.
Why, then, did Mushi Prod. go ahead instead of cancelling it? Partly pride. It had been announced. It kept Mushi in theatrical production rather than just lowly TV cartoons. It meant that Mushi would go under more spectacularly than slowly disappearing with less and less memorable TV productions. Partly because to the public, Tezuka and Mushi Prod. were synonymous, and Tezuka would not bother to cancel it. Partly to keep Mushi’s animators employed. Its staff had been increased significantly for the production of Cleopatra, and there was not enough other work left for everyone to do.
Eichi Yamamoto, who had been the director of the Kimba the White Lion TV series and the co-director of Cleopatra, became the sole director of Belladonna of Sadness. It was co-written by Yamamoto and Yoshiyuki Fukuda; the animation director was Gisaburo Sugii; the art designer was Kuni Fukai; the music was symphonic ‘70’s rock/jazz by Masahiko Satō. It was based upon La Sorcière by Jules Michelet (1862), a fictionalized study of medieval Satanism and witchcraft; though scholars considered it simplified and sensationalized. Wikipedia’s summary is, “According to Michelet, medieval witchcraft was an act of popular rebellion against the oppression of feudalism and the Roman Catholic Church. This rebellion took the form of a secret religion inspired by paganism and fairy beliefs, organized by a woman who became its leader. The participants in the secret religion met regularly at the witches’ sabbath and the Black Mass. Michelet’s account is openly sympathetic to the sufferings of peasants and women in the Middle Ages.”The plot follows the misadventures of Jeanne, a beautiful and innocent French peasant girl of the early 15th century. She and her lover, Jean, are wed in their village. However, the local Baron takes the medieval droit de seigneur, the right to have the first sex with his serfs on their wedding night. He and his men-at-arms gang-rape Jeanne. Jean, resigned to this, forgives her; but Jeanne begins to have dreams of a phallic-headed spirit urging her to take revenge against the nobility. When the French go to war against the English, the Baron appoints Jean his tax collector to raise money for the war. Jean cannot collect enough, and the Baron has his right hand amputated. The spirit tells Jeanne to begin her revenge by taking a large loan from a usurer, turning herself into a luxuriously set-up prostitute, and becoming the real power among the peasants. Jeanne succeeds, but in doing so she drives away Jean. All goes well until the Baron returns from the War. His wife, who has become jealous of Jeanne’s growing influence, accuses her of witchcraft, and she is driven out of the village. The spirit reveals himself to her as the devil, and Jeanne sells her soul for more power to take her revenge. The devil helps her to lead a peasant rebellion against their feudal overlords, including the Roman Catholic Church. This somehow turns into the story of Joan of Arc, which ends with her being burnt at the stake for witchcraft (1431).
Belladonna may not have had any “Tezuka touch”, but it remained true to his goal of animation that presented themes of adult, mature eroticism that were not pornographic. It was a much more serious film than Tezuka’s comedies. Since Mushi Prod. could not afford to produce a theatrical feature, art designer Kuni Fukai developed it as a progression of still psychedelic art drawn in the styles of Aubrey Beardsley, Gustav Klimt, and other artists of the 1890s and early 20th century, and medieval-renaissance tarot-card art, with a minimal amount of animation. It was presented as an avant-garde intellectual fine-art film. It was finished barely in time; Mushi Prod. actually declared bankruptcy a few days before its release on June 30, 1973. The distributor, Nippon Herald, gave it only a ten-day run. It had been entered for competition at the 23rd Berlin International Film Festival, June 22-July 3, 1973, which fortunately coincided with its brief release. It did not win any award, and it was a commercial failure due to its short release and its lack of animation. But at least Mushi Production Company went out with a grand finale.
(Unfortunately for a dramatic ending, the bankruptcy proceedings took another four years. In 1977, Mushi Prod. resumed operations under new management, but it was an entirely new company with a different staff. It is still in business today, doing more animation subcontracting for other studios than producing its own films; but it does release an occasional feature.)